About LEAD
Leadership Effectiveness Assessment for Development
The decisive point of leadership lies in the ability to make decisions and integration
Kang Shi Teng Assessment Center X China Europe International Business School Management – Dr. Wang Anzhi
Jointly developed with Professor Wang Anzhi of China Europe International Business School, the assessment uses Asia’s huge database of data, scientific tools, and through behavioral contradiction analysis and thinking integration analysis, to present the talent potential in a digital way to help enterprises select and cultivate successors and reserve talents.
Difficulties in cultivating successors and reserving talents
Kang Shiteng knows it
- How to select a successor who can adapt to future changes from partners with equal performance, ability and motivation?
- Do you want to find managers who have departmental expertise and can think outside the box and integrate different decision-making thinking?
Features of the LEAD Effective Leadership Thinking Behavior Scale
- Based on the theory of leadership and decision-making, it measures the thinking integrity and behavioral tendency of supervisors when making decisions.
- Diagnose bottlenecks that current or future supervisors may encounter and provide recommendations for development.
- Through one-on-one coaching or other training programs, we help supervisors prepare for future roles in advance.
Theoretical Basis of LEAD Assessment
Based on the theories related to
leadership
and
decision-making
and the emphasis and presentation of Chinese leaders
Opposing thinking
Contradictory aspect
Two
potential conflictsare all very important points
Two
potential conflictsBehaviors that are related to each other
Pay attention to the short term – every period of performance must meet the standard
VS.
Attaching importance to long-term and sustainable operation is the foundation of the enterprise
Pursue equality – when distributing resources, try to get everyone to the same starting point
VS.
Emphasis on relationships – Arrangements are made on a case-by-case basis
Scale question design
Thinking Integration Analysis
The requirements are double high and the decision-making is more comprehensive
Time preference
Coopetition relationship
Risk Tolerance
Ideal orientation
Mindset
Behavioral contradiction analysis
It is required to be single high and follow the main theme
Relational orientation
People I prefer
Decision-making patterns
Strength is required
Power distance
Testing process
Measurement process
- Inaugural Meeting
- Assessment briefing
- System faces
Fill in the online assessment
1. Maintain the smooth operation of the system
2. Regularly track the status of the fill-in
3. Send reminder letters
4. Close the answering system after the deadline
- Report production
- Report interpretation meeting
- Corporate Briefings
Related columns
You must be logged in to post a comment.